#6 CORE MAC PRO PRO#
#6 CORE MAC PRO SOFTWARE#
#6 CORE MAC PRO BLUETOOTH#

The 12-core Mac Pro was 37 percent faster in our HandBrake test, 73 percent faster in our CineBench CPU test, for example. A 2.93GHz Core i7 quad-core iMac costs less than half as much as the 12-core Mac Pro, which was just 17 percent faster overall-almost all of the performance benefit of the 12-core Mac Pro was in our multi-processor savvy application tasks. Looking at some BTO options on the iMac, however, the iMac fares better and costs considerably less. The 12-core Mac Pro was 34 percent faster, overall, than the 2009 8-core 2.26GHz Xeon Nehalem Mac Pro, and 42 percent faster than the 2009 quad-core 2.66GHz Xeon Nehalem Mac Pro.Д¬ompared to the high-end standard configuration 27-inch iMac with a 2.8GHz Core i5 quad-core processor, the 12-core Mac Pro was 33 percent faster overall. Identifiers: Late 2013 - MD878LL/A - MacPro6,1 - A1481 - 2630 All Mac Pro Models All 2013 Models Dynamically Compare This Mac to Others. If the clock speed ratio is less than that, then cores beats clockspeed. Apple Mac Pro 'Six Core' 3.5 (Late 2013) Specs. An 8-core processor is 33 faster than a 6-core processor, all other things being equal. Testing the 12-core Mac Pro with 12GB of RAM (six 2GB DIMMs provided by Crucial) showed very little improvement over the 12-core Mac Pro with 6GB of RAM-just one Speedmark point. (361,429 points) 10:18 AM in response to stormchaser977 More cores is proportionately faster, just as is clock speed. It was outperformed by a $3699 built-to-order (BTO) Mac Pro with a 3.33GHz 6-core Xeon Westmere processor, which was faster in 10 of our 17 tests, and matched the 12-core Mac ProвЂ™s scores in two other tests. The new 12-core Mac Pro was 26 percent faster overall than the new low-end Mac Pro, a quad-core system running at 2.8GHz.ДЄs shown in our вЂњ Fastest Macs money can buyвЂќ report, the 12-core Mac Pro was not the overall speed king in our tests. The 12-core Mac ProвЂ™s Speedmark 6.5 score was 21 percent faster than the 8-core 2.4GHz Xeon Mac Pro, with a 52 percent higher MathematicaMark score, 36 percent faster CineBench R15 CPU score, and 19 percent faster HandBrake result. Results from HandBrake, CineBench CPU, and MathematicaMark (all using the available 24 virtual processing cores), were the fastest weвЂ™ve seen.

#6 CORE MAC PRO SOFTWARE#

With iMacs and lower-priced Mac Pros outperforming the 12-core model at many everyday tasks, it was only in the handful of high-end, specialized software tests that the 12-core Mac Pro shined. To really bust on the processor more specifically we fired up some Flash video, pitting our new Core i7 Pro against an 'old' MacBook Pro with a 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo processor and 4GB of RAM.

#6 CORE MAC PRO BLUETOOTH#

Ports and connectivity come via 6 high speed Thunderbolt 2 ports, 1 UltraHD HDMI 1.4 port, 4 USB 3.0 ports, a pair of Gigabit ethernets plus 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.0.If the $5000 price didnвЂ™t give it away, our tests of the 12-core Mac Pro show that this Mac Pro is not meant for the average consumer. The base factory configuration for this model is 12GB DDR3-1866 (PC3-14900) ECC SDRAM (three 4GB DIMMs, officially expandable to 64GB but currently supports 128GB), one 256GB PCIe SSD drive plus a pair of AMD D300 FirePro graphics cards, each running 2GB of GDDR5 RAM. This model Mac Pro Six Core 3.5GHz (Late 2013) gets it's power from a single 3.5GHz Six Core 22-nm Xeon E5 1650v2 processor with 256k of dedicated level 2 cache per core and 12MB of level 3 'Smart-Cache'.

Display support for these workstation level machines allows for 1 UltraHD HDMI display or up to 6 Thunderbolt displays or up to a pair of 4k displays.

These machines are designed for 'external' expansion via their vast array of high speed ports. Processor upgrades are also possible but only for the brave. With it's much smaller 'Mr Fusion' profile the only internal expansion allowed comes from the 4 easily accessed memory slots. No one will confuse the Late 2013 'Dustbin' Mac Pro for previous models.

6 core mac pro